Computational Materials Science, as a Service

We calculate what you'd otherwise have to guess at — before you touch a lab bench.

Materials Quest Research Group runs DFT and machine-learning studies on electrode materials, catalysts, and 2D materials for academic groups and industry R&D teams who need results, not a new hire.

DFTVASP · Quantum ESPRESSO
MLInteratomic potentials · screening
2–6 wktypical delivery window

What we do

Four ways to get computation off your plate

Each engagement is scoped as a fixed deliverable — a report, a dataset, a ranked candidate list — not an open-ended retainer.

01

DFT electronic structure & properties

Band structure, density of states, formation energy, and defect calculations for electrode, catalyst, and 2D-material candidates.

VASPQECP2K
02

ML-accelerated screening

Machine-learned interatomic potentials and surrogate models to screen thousands of candidate structures or compositions fast.

MLIPhigh-throughput
03

Custom workflow builds

Automated pipelines connecting structure generation, DFT/ML calculation, and analysis — handed off as code you keep.

automationreproducible
04

Training & collaboration

Workshops and embedded support for groups building in-house DFT/ML capability, plus co-authored academic collaborations.

workshopsco-authorship

How an engagement runs

Three stages, one deliverable

1 DEFINE

Scope the system

We pin down the material system, the property you need answered, and what "done" looks like — usually within one call.

2 COMPUTE

Run the calculations

DFT and/or ML calculations run on our compute allocation, with interim checkpoints if the engagement runs longer than two weeks.

3 DELIVER

Hand off results

A written report with figures, raw output files, and — for method-heavy work — the code, so it's reproducible on your end.

Research themes

Work we've actually done, not stock imagery

Every figure below comes from our own calculations. This is the depth of analysis an engagement delivers.

THEME 01 · ENERGY MATERIALS

Computational design of energy materials

We map how defects, dopants, and ion transport govern performance, then screen candidate chemistries at scale before anyone touches a lab bench. Two examples from that work: the defect physics behind cathode rate capability, and a high-throughput screen of a 2D anode family — 26 transition metals across 4 crystal phases against 4 carrier ions, over a hundred candidates ranked by stability, voltage, and capacity.

Crystal structure of a Li-ion cathode showing oxygen vacancies and a schematic of Li-ion migration barriers coupled to polaron sites
Oxygen vacancies and polarons coupled to Li⁺ migration in a cathode oxide — the defect physics behind rate capability.
Periodic table highlighting 26 transition metals, 4 carrier ions, and 4 crystal phases screened for M2B2 MBene anodes
High-throughput screening of M₂B₂ MBene anodes: 26 metals × 4 phases × 4 carrier ions.
Top and side view of the atomic structure of two-dimensional Mo2B2
Atomic structure of 2D Mo₂B₂, one of the MBene family members in our screening set.
THEME 02 · CATALYSIS

Catalysts for thermal and electrocatalysis

From adsorption energetics on a bare surface to full reaction networks under applied potential, we model both thermally- and electrochemically-driven catalytic systems and connect DFT energies to measurable yields and selectivity. The examples below span three reaction classes: CO₂ hydrogenation over a phase-separated bimetallic catalyst, the full electrochemical CO₂ reduction network, and biomass oxidation validated directly against experimental yield data.

Atomistic model of a phase-separated Cu-Zn catalyst surface with CO2, H2, and methanol molecules, examined by DFT
Phase-separated Cu–Zn catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation, resolved at the atomic scale.
Reaction network diagram for electrochemical CO2 reduction showing pathways to CO, CH4, and C2 products, with the competing hydrogen evolution reaction
Complete CO₂ reduction network to CO, CH₄, and C₂ products, mapped against the competing HER.
Schematic linking experiment, DFT, and microkinetic modeling for HMF oxidation to FDCA on a beta-MnO2 surface
HMF → FDCA oxidation on β-MnO₂: DFT + microkinetic modeling, validated against experiment.
THEME 03 · MACHINE-LEARNED POTENTIALS

Machine learning potentials for larger and longer scale simulation

DFT alone can't reach the system sizes or timescales many real problems need. We train machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIP) on DFT data to drive molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations orders of magnitude larger and longer — tracking phase transformations, diffusion, and surface processes across thousands of atoms and nanoseconds rather than tens of atoms and picoseconds. The examples below apply this to hydrogen storage: spillover into a metal host, a Monte Carlo study of a hydride phase transformation, and molecular dynamics of hydrogen uptake into a nanoparticle.

Atomistic model showing hydrogen spillover from a Ni-V cluster onto a Mg surface and stepwise migration into subsurface sites
Hydrogen spillover from a Ni–V cluster into a Mg host, followed site by site from cluster to subsurface.
MLIP-driven Monte Carlo snapshot of a magnesium hydride system showing structural views from multiple angles, a SOAP-distance histogram separating rutile and HCP local environments, and colorbars for H/M ratio and volume per formula unit
MLIP Monte Carlo tracking of a Mg–H phase transformation, with SOAP descriptors separating rutile- and HCP-like local structure as hydrogenation proceeds.
Molecular dynamics snapshot of a spherical metal nanoparticle with hydrogen atoms distributed throughout its structure
MLIP molecular dynamics snapshot of hydrogen uptake into a metal nanoparticle, resolved atom by atom.
THEME 04 · MACHINE LEARNING

Interpretable ML for materials discovery

We train surrogate models on DFT data to screen candidates orders of magnitude faster than direct calculation — and we don't stop at accuracy. SHAP analysis identifies which physical descriptors actually drive predictions, so the model tells you why a material works, not just that it does.

Parity plot of machine-learning predicted values versus DFT reference values for training and test sets, clustered along the diagonal
Surrogate model accuracy: predictions vs DFT reference values across train and test sets.
SHAP summary plot ranking feature importance, with electronegativity of the carrier ion as the dominant descriptor
SHAP analysis: carrier-ion electronegativity and metal d-electrons dominate the model's decisions.

About the company

Run by researchers who do this work themselves

Materials Quest is a computational research group operating under the academic services of Suranaree University of Technology (SUT). We are open for collaboration.

Suranaree University of Technology Operated under the academic services of
Suranaree University of Technology
/01

Fixed scope, fixed price

You get a quote before we start, tied to a defined deliverable — not billed hours on an open task.

/02

Reproducibility by default

Inputs, parameters, and convergence criteria are documented so results hold up under review.

/03

Confidential by default

Industry engagements are covered by NDA on request; nothing is published without your sign-off.

/04

Academic-rate option

Reduced pricing for university groups, with co-authorship available in place of a fee.

Get in touch

Tell us what you're trying to answer

A short description of the material system and the question you need answered is enough for us to scope a quote — usually within two business days.

Response time — within 2 business days